Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Three Things I Have Learned In Three Years Advocating For Autism Insurance Reform In North Carolina

September 29, 2015 marked a historic day for Autism Insurance Reform in North Carolina. Late in the day on September 29, 2015, after pushing the matter off twice earlier in the day, the North Carolina Senate voted 47 to 1 to concur with the version of S676 that the North Carolina House of Representatives passed the night before.  The Governor of North Carolina has apparently conveyed the message that he will sign this bill and, therefore, I expect it to become law.  As you will know from my prior posts, I am not particularly happy with the language of the bill. Specifically, I am bothered by the fact that the North Carolina statutes will include a statute that has a definition of the term mental illness that specifically excludes autism spectrum disorders.  I believe this is absolutely absurd and it shines a bad light on our state and how it views persons with special needs such as autism. I was also disturbed by comments made by a particular member of the legislature on the floor of the General Assembly when that particular person bragged about making sure that the coverage has particular caps to limit coverage.  I have no qualms with caps and would not expect them to pass a bill without them, but in my eyes, the person was essentially bragging about being the person who limited the help that special needs kids could get and, to me, that is absolutely disgusting.

With all of that said, the purpose of this post was not to be negative. On a happy note, I can say that autism families in North Carolina can now celebrate the fact there is some amount of mandated coverage for autism therapies in North Carolina. Autism Families in North Carolina can now celebrate the fact that the bill was tweaked at the last minute to add at least some amount of cover in the event that Blue Cross Blue Shield "forgets" in the future that it has publicly stated multiple times that the mental health parity carve out in the bill was only inserted to make sure the caps were enforceable and not in an effort to deny mental health parity protection in any manner.  Autism Families in North Carolina can now celebrate the fact that after years of fighting and screaming from the rooftops that our kids matter that the North Carolina General Assembly has finally listened, at least a little bit.

Keller and a friend, Samuel,
that she made along the way
in our journey in this fight.
So, what I have learned from my three years in the fight. First and foremost, I have learned what an awesome community the North Carolina Autism Families are in North Carolina. During this fight countless families have spent time going to Raleigh to knock on the doors of members of the General Assembly asking that the General Assembly make the changes we were demanding. Even more families spent time writing letters and e-mails and calling members of the General Assembly demanding the change that we knew was needed for our children. In doing all of this work, we, the families, made new friends and built a solid sense of camaraderie that made the fight even seem all the more worth the while. From a personal perspective, I have made new friends from Charlotte, Greenville, Greensboro and other places that I don't think I would have made had we not gotten into this fight together. Some of these people like Bob D'Amelio from Charlotte have been fighting for this for more than six years! These friendships are sure to last as we all continue to share a common interest along with common experiences with our kids.

Walking the halls and
trying to get things done!

What is even more astounding was that we as a community of families had to rally even harder after many of the Service Provider groups such as the Autism Society of North Carolina abandoned the families earlier this year and cut a deal with Blue Cross Blue Shield to support language that was not what our children deserved. As I have gone on about in detail in prior posts, not only did these groups abandon the families, they absolutely refused to speak to us or address our concerns. In fact, they barred us from their Social Media pages when we tried to post about our issues with the positions they were taking. As an aside and interestingly, an apparent employee of one of these groups, Leslie Welch who lives in Raleigh, felt the need to attack those who helped us in this fight on social media after the bill passed.  Rather than give up on the fight in the face of this abandonment, we, the families, organized ourselves even more and took up the fight absolutely on our own.  All of a sudden private message groups were formed on Facebook. E-mails were sent between families from all over the state. Phone conversations were had between families and strategies were made in an effort to ask the General Assembly the question of why were we, the families and the people who would be most affected by the legislation, being denied a seat at the negotiating table. We never got an answer on that question but I am confident that our voice was heard and it was our voice that led to at least the amendment that was made at the end.

The second thing that I have learned is there are some good politicians out there. Over the span of the last several months, Representative Chuck McGrady has constantly communicated with me about what was going on with the bill. In these communications, Rep. McGrady and I shared ideas and thoughts and he provided me with a genuine and honest perspective on why things were and were not happening with the bill. When things weren't going our way Rep. McGrady always apologized even though I told him there was no need to do so since I knew he was doing all that he could. Indeed Rep. McGrady was with us to the end by demanding that Blue Cross Blue Shield release a letter to us that they had apparently given to the Autism Society of North Carolina on August 19 and the Autism Society of North Carolina had refused to share with the Autism Families, which letter states that its Blue Cross Blue Shield's intent to interpret the bill as requiring that they add new coverage while not removing anything they are already doing.  Rep. McGrady also fought for and got us the last minute amendment that I described above.  Rep. McGrady should not be blamed for the shortcomings of S676, instead I hope that all members of the North Carolina Autism Community will thank Rep. McGrady for his work in putting our kids first and doing everything in his power to make this bill as good for our children as he could.  Our General Assembly would be in a lot better shape if we had more politicians there who saw things like Rep. McGrady. 

The third thing that I have learned is that there are great advocates out there who may not share our home in North Carolina or have children like we do, but who are folks who are are willing to fight just as hard as we are in this battle. In particular, I would ask the North Carolina Autism Community to thank Lorri Unumb, Patrick Ballentine, and Jimmy Broughton for the work they have done for us the past couple years. Lorri, of course, has made such a huge impact in getting better autism insurance laws in place all over the country and we are unbelievably lucky that she became interested in North Carolina. Without her expertise, I do not believe we would have ever gotten this done. Lorri, like many of us, is the parent of a child on the spectrum and she shares the experiences that many of us have and does a great job portraying that to the members of the General Assembly. Also, when the other autism organizations in North Carolina, like the Autism Society of North Carolina, were selling out on language in the bill to the whims of Blue Cross Blue Shield with out researching and understanding the impact of what they were agreeing to, Lorri, instead spent her time researching and interpreting the language and educating the North Carolina Autism Families on what such language meant and what its impact would be. This knowledge and work proved to be invaluable to us. Beyond that, Patrick and Jimmy (before taking a job in the Governor's office this year), worked for us families as lobbyists along side Lorri helping Lorri understand and weed through the political environment at the General Assembly. As anyone who has read much about the General Assembly, let alone anyone who has visited the place, could tell you, the General Assembly is filled with egos, ideas, and personalities. To get anything done, a group needs to learn how to navigate and satisfy those egos and personalities. Even though they do not have children on the spectrum, Patrick and Jimmy in there time lobbying for us took up the cause with as much muster as we the families did and worked to make the legislation happen in as good a form for us as they could.

So, the bill is going to become law, what do we do now? Unfortunately, the fight is not over and the battle continues. Its time we move on to improving the bill and demanding that the North Carolina General Assembly remove the carve out they have just put in place. Its my hope that by the start of the short session we can agree to some language that has proved successful in another state or elsewhere that will be sufficient for Blue Cross Blue Shield to have the comfort that they apparently need to agree to removal of the carve out. After all if the enforceablilty of the caps is the only reason Blue Cross Blue Shield needs the carve out like they say it is, they should agree to remove it if other language works. We also need to demand that the North Carolina Senate move on the licensure bill that stalled in its chambers after being passed by the North Carolina House of Representatives earlier this year. Its my hope that the Autism Society of the North Carolina and the other groups will join with the families in these fights, rather than continue to stand as a roadblock in our way, and help make the legislation better for our kids!

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

A New Letter to The General Assembly. Its Time To Act By Making the Change We Demand

As most may know from social media, a large group of Autism Family Members in North Carolina are not happy with the language in S 676 as it is written as of September 9, 2015 that carves out autism from the protections of federal mental health parity law. The General Assembly's session is winding to a close after a long summer so some of us decided it was time to show the General Assembly how many of us are not happy with that language.  This was especially necessary given the fact that the Autism Society of North Carolina and other organizations are pushing what I consider to be an inaccurate and irresponsible line that mental health parity would not be effected in a meaningful manner by the current language.

Accordingly, I am posting below the letter that was hand delivered to each of the members of the North Carolina General Assembly this morning.  I was excited and enthused to see such a great response from North Carolina citizens, including a big list of citizens who have families members on the autism spectrum, who are with me and demanding the General Assembly pass legislation that provides insurance coverage for autism while also maintaining mental health parity rights. Time is short on this for this year, hopefully the General Assembly listens to us.

A group of families advocating last summer.

September 9, 2015

Dear Senators, Representatives, and those Interested in Autism Insurance Reform:

You may remember that we are Autism Dad’s who wrote to you back in July to raise an issue that we had with the mental health parity carve out for autism in the current form SB 676. In that letter, we proposed a simple fix to the language of SB 676 that would preserve our children’s protections under federal mental health parity laws while also allowing the insurance providers to have comfort that the legislation’s age and coverage limit caps are enforceable.  As a refresher, the simple fix that we proposed was to change N.C.G.S. § 58-3-192 so that it reads: “Notwithstanding the definition of 'mental illness' in G.S. 58-3-220, 58-51-55, 58-65-90 and 58-67-75, coverage for adaptive behavior treatment under this section may be subject to a maximum benefit of up to forty thousand dollars ($40,000) per year and may be limited to individuals 18 years of age or younger.”  With this change, the proposed amendments to N.C.G.S. §§ 58-3-220, 58-51-55, 58-65-90 and 58-67-75 that carve out our children’s federal mental health parity rights could be removed from SB 676 while preserving the enforceability of the age and coverage caps.   

Since sending the letter, we have continued to advocate for the change that we proposed.  We have asked questions of the insurance companies and of the groups supporting the current form of SB 676, who say they advocate for us, why the language we proposed is not an acceptable alternative.  Our questions to these groups have gone unanswered.  Indeed, those groups actually refuse to respond to us altogether.  Instead, the groups continue to release “FAQ’s” that we believe are inaccurate.  Again, we are unable to discuss these inaccuracies with the groups because they refuse to communicate with us.   

We recognize that this session appears to be coming to an end so it is time to do something with SB 676.  With that in mind, over the past weekend we polled North Carolina Autism Families from around the state to see whether they would rather see a version of SB 676 in its current form that removes Autism Spectrum Disorders from the coverage of federal mental health parity protections pass or if they would rather have the North Carolina House of Representatives amend SB676 to maintain our children’s federal mental health parity rights even in the face of threats that the bill will be killed if SB 676 is amended.  We limited the question just to families because it will be the families who are most affected by any loss of federal mental health parity rights, not the service providers or the insurance companies. 

Attached to this letter you will find a list of North Carolina Autism Family Members who if given those options, would rather see a change made to SB 676.  We were not surprised to see the overwhelming response that we received.  What this response shows is that North Carolina Autism Families care about these issues.  What this response shows is that North Carolina Autism Families trust that the members of the North Carolina State Senate will do what is right and just for our children and will not actually kill SB 676 if it is presented to them in a form that will preserve federal mental health parity rights and maintain the enforceability of the age and coverage limit caps.  What this response shows is that North Carolina Autism Families do not want to sacrifice their children’s federal mental health parity rights and risk being put in a situation where:

•  Their insurance company could force them to try an alternate treatment or therapy and prove that the alternative treatment or therapy failed before authorizing the treatment or therapy recommended by the family’s doctor.

•  Their insurance company could force them to choose from a very limited supply of in-network providers rather than allowing them to decide if they want to use an in-network provider or an out-of-network provider. 

•  Their insurance company could prevent them from seeing an out-of-state specialist.

• Their insurance company could apply different (more difficult) preauthorization standards to their autism claims than to all other claims.

•  Their insurance company could apply different medical necessity standards and criteria to determine coverage or exclusion of a specific service.

•  Their insurance company could require different standards for provider admission to participate in a network.

•  Their insurance company could impose disparate treatment limitations based on geography, facility type, or provider specialty.

•  Their insurance company could impose different criteria limiting the scope or duration of benefits or services.

Each of the listed scenarios are possible for our families should our children lose their federal mental health parity rights. We hope when you read the scenarios you can see why we, as a group of North Carolina autism families, feel so strongly about this issue and why we urge you to make our proposed changes to SB 676. 

Please do not put another obstacle in our children’s way by passing SB 676 and taking away our children’s federal mental health parity rights.  You have an amazing opportunity to do what 42 other states have done, which is to pass meaningful legislation that preserves existing federal mental health parity rights for children on the autism spectrum while also creating a wonderful tool that will help each of our children better their lives.  We hope you take this opportunity and run with it!

                                       
Brian Pearce                                  Kyle Robinson                              John Mies
Charlie’s Dad                                Samuel’s Dad                                Jack’s Dad
1711 Swannanoa Drive                 535 Cedar Ridge Drive                 7102 Leaning Tree Dr.
Greensboro, NC 27410                 Winterville, NC 28590                  Greensboro, NC 27410
bpearce@nexsenpruet.com           jkrbhr2007@gmail.com                john.mies@volvo.com
336-404-0214                                843-408-6870                                336-255-2521
                        
NORTH CAROLINA AUTISM FAMILIES IN SUPPORT OF THIS LETTER

1.       Robert & Christi D’Amelio, Mom and Dad, Charlotte, NC
2.       Shanna Dowd & Malcolm Richardson, Mom and Dad, Greensboro, NC
3.       Josh and Kim Edgar, Mom and Dad,  Greensboro, NC
4.       John Burress, Grandfather, Winston-Salem, NC
5.       Katharine and Scott Kollins, Mom and Dad, Durham, NC
6.       Zack and Lauren Matheny, Mom and Dad, Greensboro, NC
7.       Bill Fansworth, Dad, Charlotte, NC
8.       Tim Newman, Dad,  Charlotte, NC
9.       Michelle Leatherman, Mom, High Point, NC
10.    Jeff Leatherman, Dad, Greensboro, NC
11.    Delores A Revill, Grandmother, Holly Springs, NC
12.    Sara and Jamie Payne, Mom and Dad, High Point, NC
13.    Andrea Worthington, Mom, Greensboro, NC
14.    Kimberly Pace, Mom, Charlotte, NC
15.    Jimmy Miller, Dad, Harrisburg, NC
16.    Elizabeth and John McKee, Mom and Dad, Greensboro NC
17.    Dan Johnson, Dad, Charlotte, NC
18.    Joanne and Frank Ovnic, Grandmother and Grandfather, Kernersville, NC
19.    Cheri Nye Sharon, Mom, Greensboro, NC
20.    Ashly Oria-Adams, Mom, Cabarrus County, NC
21.    Lisa and Vincent Simone, Mom and Dad, Charlotte, NC
22.    Bob and Donnie Holder, Grandmother and Grandfather, Winston-Salem, NC
23.    Stephanie & Michael Mullen, Mom and Dad, Denver, NC
24.    Butch and Elizabeth McConnell, Grandmother and Grandfather, Gastonia, NC
25.    Kay Farrell, Mom, Chapel Hill, NC
26.    Jenny Gandee, Mom, Greensboro, NC
27.    Ava Neyer, Mom, Fayetteville, NC
28.    Emily and Steven Cayton, Mom and Dad, Winston-Salem, NC
29.    Trudy J. Pearce, Grandmother, Charlotte, NC
30.    Bobbie H. Robinson, Mom, Winterville, NC
31.    Patrick and Emily McConnell, Aunt and Uncle, Durham, NC
32.    Allison and Brent Brewer, Mom and Dad, Winston-Salem, NC
33.    Mike and Debbie Brooks, Grandmother and Grandfather, Oak Ridge, NC
34.    Angie and Doug Brown, Mom and Dad, Brown Summit, NC
35.    Eric J. and Sonya B. Pearce, Uncle and Aunt, Concord, NC
36.    Chris Omohundro, Dad, Greensboro, NC
37.    Krystal Ketner, Mom, Greensboro, NC
38.    Tim Ketner, Dad, Gibsonville, NC
39.    Shea Capps, Mom, Jamestown, NC
40.    Nancy and Wilmer Leatherman, Grandmother and Grandfather, High Point, NC
41.    Gwen and Kurt Bartley, Mom and Dad, Cabarrus County, NC
42.    Rita Capps, Grandmother, Jamestown, NC
43.    Lance and Mollie Jimison, Uncle and Aunt, Belmont, NC
44.    Wendy B. Mies, Mom, Greensboro, NC
45.    Allison and Chris Hocker, Mom and Dad,  Greensboro, NC
46.    Sarah Wade, Cousin, Greensboro, NC
47.    Amber and Todd Ostrander, Mom and Dad, Harrisburg, NC
48.    Amie and Vic Cennamo, Mom and Dad, Cabarrus County, NC
49.    Paul Ovnic, Uncle, Kernersville, NC
50.    Miranda Balla, Mom, Greensboro NC
51.    Michelle and Howard Shaffer Hitchcock, Mom and Dad, Harrisburg, NC
52.    Laura & Joe Milliken, Mom and Dad, Harrisburg, NC
53.    Mary Cook, Grandmother, Kernersville NC
54.    Kris Veno, Mother, Fayetteville, NC
55.    Caroline M. Pearce, Mom, Greensboro, NC
56.    Mark Stafford, Father, Chapel Hill, NC
57.    Tommy and Kimberly Ledbetter, Aunt and Uncle, Clemmons, NC
58.    Bates Chapman, Father, Raleigh, NC
59.    Michael McConnell, Uncle, Belmont, NC
60.    Vanessa Budet and Juan Jose Flores, Mom and Dad, Greensboro, NC
61.    Meghan Rhodes, Mom, Charlotte, NC
62.    Beth Waterfield, Mom, Oak Ridge, NC
63.    Jessica Williams, Mom
64.    Lindsay Slate, Mom, Kernersville, NC
65.    Kimberly Pace, Mom, Matthews, NC
66.    Todd and Karen Allen, Uncle and Aunt, Kernersville, NC
67.    Penny Andrew, Mom, Kernersville, NC
68.    Consuelo Robbins, Mom, Greensboro, NC
69.    Terrence Gerald Sr., Dad, Kernersville, NC
70.    Linda and David Cobb, Aunt and Uncle, Franklinton, NC 
71.    Scott and Melissa Brooks, Uncle and Aunt, Oak Ridge, NC
72.    Paula Munos, Mom, Greenville, NC
73.    Kent Adams, Dad, Greensboro, NC
74.    Harold and Melba Little, Mom and Dad, Tarboro, NC
75.    Lara Easley, Mom, Greensboro, NC
76.    Matt and Sara English, Mom and Dad, Winston-Salem, NC
77.    Cindy Bowen, Mom, Winston-Salem, NC
78.    Monte and Laurie Brackett, Mom and Dad, Oak Ridge, NC
79.    Vicki Koch, Aunt, Colfax, NC
80.    West and Jeni Fowler, Mom and Dad, Winston-Salem, NC
81.    Christy Sherman, Mom, Advance, NC
82.    Marcy Morris and Edward Morris Jr., Mom and Dad, Greensboro, NC
83.    Mary Gilliam, Mom, Advance, NC
84.    Kim and Chris Smith, Mom and Dad, Matthews, NC
85.    Lisa Simone, Mom, Charlotte, NC
86.    Julie Toburen, Mom, Charlotte, NC
87.    Erik J. Dillard, Dad, Greensboro, NC
88.    Heather Davis, Mom, Charlotte, NC
89.    Joel and Lynn Payne, Aunt and Uncle, High Point, NC
90.    Carol and Joel Payne, Grandmother and Grandfather, High Point, NC

When we sent out the question that is set out in the above letter to the family groups we were able to reach, we received responses from other North Carolina citizens who are connected to autism in some meaningful way and who wanted to share their support for our position.  Accordingly, we have included those names below in addition to the family names above.  It is also possible that some of these individuals have family members touched by autism, but we have not been able to verify it so we did not include them in the above list. As an additional note, it was our intention to post our question to the Facebook page of the Autism Society of North Carolina, but when Brian Pearce attempted to do so, he learned that he had been blocked from their page, so we were unable to do so.

NORTH CAROLINA CITIZENS IN SUPPORT OF THIS LETTER

91.    Kelli and Gary Embler, Harrisburg, NC
92.    Lisa and Ethan Hagen, Teacher, Charlotte, NC
93.    Leslie & Darrel Sprick, Mooresville, NC
94.    Leslie Kidder, Mooresville, NC
95.    Ashley Poteat Pagliughi, Huntersville, NC
96.    Kay Stapleton, Mooresville, NC
97.    Bill and Marina Leonidas, Charlotte, NC
98.    Gwen Robbins Schug, Associate Professor, Appalachian State University
99.    Christine and Rich Manning, Charlotte, NC
100.Shawn and Amy Guffey, Charlotte, NC
101.Ann McCormick, Lillington, NC
102.Rene Bess, Lincoln County, NC
103.Laura Schuchart, Apex, NC
104.Amy Swaim, High Point, NC
105.Adolfo and Brooke Silva, Oak Ridge, NC
106.Phil and LeeAnn Cathcart, Greensboro, NC
107.Jordan Allen, Kernersville, NC 
108.Joseph Allen, High Point NC
109.Darin  and Ashley Wells, Kernersville, NC
110.Bonita Moon, Greensboro, NC
111.GeRita T Walden, Jamestown, NC
112.Jeff Holland, Raleigh, NC
113.Susan Cannady, Greensboro, NC
114.Nick Trull, Asheboro, NC
115.Rebecca Coplin, Greensboro, NC
116.Keiko L Pace, Charlotte, NC
117.Kay Parker, Asheboro, NC
118.Christine and Rich Manning, Charlotte, NC
119.Katie and Reilly O’Neal, Raleigh, NC
120.Marla O’Neill, Indian Trail, NC
121.Jennifer Berry, Creedmoor, NC
122.Kristen Kevorkian, Jamestown, NC
123.Bonnie Currin, Sanford, NC
124.Cody Vogan, Greensboro, NC
125.Stephen and Nicole Kohut, Greensboro, NC
126.Marianne Alexander, Kernersville, NC
127.Catherine and David Lane, Summerfield, NC
128.Tiffany Cornwall, Wilmington, NC
129.Shanee and Grandin Howell, Winston-Salem, NC
130.Michael Sherman, Raleigh, NC
131.Pat and David Townsend, Troutman, NC
132.Haylee Ambler, Hendersonville, NC
133.Patrick Lattimore
134.Sandra Lenins
135.Jessica Fett Gutierrez
136.Kim Pepper
137.Eban Kea
138. Carol Campbell
139.Ann McCormick
140.Summer Merier
141.Nicole Carpenter
142.Melissa Johnson
143.Tammy Wray
144.Ximena Caceres
145.Tiffany Blackburn
146.Susan Jones
147.Andrea Knipp
148.Apple Boyce
149.Donna Anders
150.Rebecca Clickeua
151.Tammy B. Kenney
152.Vicky Ducheneaux



Tuesday, August 25, 2015

An Open Letter to the Autism Society of North Carolina- I've Had it With You!

This morning Caroline received an e-mail from the Autism Society of North Carolina that I am sure went to a lot of families in North Carolina. In that e-mail the Autism Society of North Carolina asked the families to contact their representative in the North Carolina State House and ask them to move S676 our of the House Rules Committee. Interestingly in that e-mail, the Autism Society of North Carolina made the point that the State House has twice before passed Autism Insurance bills by very wide margin. What the Autism Society of North Carolina did not do in the e-mail, is explain that those two previous bills were very different than S676 in a large way, namely, those bills did not eliminate mental health parity protections for children on the autism spectrum. Nope, they did not mention mental health parity protection in any way. 

As I have said in prior posts, I have e-mailed the Board of Directors of the Autism Society of North Carolina to try to start a dialogue on the topic of why the Autism Society of North Carolina is so willing to trade away Charlie's mental health parity protections. The only response I received was from one member of the Board who said he agreed with me. I also have called the Autism Society of North Carolina's lobbyist to discuss the same issue. She didn't call me back. And this is a group that says they look out for North Carolina families.

After seeing the e-mail from the Autism Society of North Carolina this morning, I hit my breaking point with them. As a result, I sent the following e-mail to Tracey Sheriff, their director, also to Jen Mahan, their lobbyist. I sent my email roughly three hours before I wrote this post and not surprisingly there has been no reply. 

I'd implore any families who have reached the frustration level that I have with the Autism Society of North Carolina to do the same and e-mail the Autism Society and express your disappointment with them. Mr. Sheriff's email address is tsheriff@autismsociety-nc.org. Ms. Mahan's email address is jmahan@autismsociety-nc.org.  Ask these folks why they are so willing to trade our kids rights. My only guess is they are willing to do so because they will see the benefit of the insurance payments while not having to deal with the ramifications of not having mental health parity rights. While you are sending e-mails, also sent e-mails to your Representative and Senators asking them to pass meaningful autism insurance reform that will also protect our children's rights under mental health parity law rather than S676 which will eliminate those rights.

My e-mail was a follows:

I am the father of a 4 year old boy on the autism spectrum. I have seen the e-mail that your organization has sent out this morning imploring N.C. families to contact their representatives and ask that the House move on S676. While I appreciate that we share a common goal in making autism insurance reform happen in North Carolina, we differ with respect to our views on S676. I have called Ms. Mahan and written your Board of Directors asking that we open a dialogue on why the Autism Society of North Carolina is accepting proposed legislation that will eliminate children like my child’s rights under Mental Health Parity Law. The only response that I received was an e-mail from one of your board members who agreed with my concerns. This leads me to ask how you are holding yourself out to be an organization protecting the rights of North Carolina autism families when you refuse to even acknowledge the concerns of those families? Trust me, as I know you are aware, there are many many families in North Carolina that feel the same way as I do on this point.

Quite frankly I think it is downright irresponsible that you sent out your email with talking points but refused to acknowledge the elimination of these rights. Indeed it appears to me that rather than informing the families to whom you are sending the e-mail about the full impact of the legislation you are asking them to push, you are trying to “hide the ball” and not let these families know that their children will lose rights should this legislation be passed.

I understand that your organization is a provider organization that will benefit from S676 in its current form because you will obtain payments from the insurance companies when this coverage is in place.  However, you will not be impacted by the loss of mental health parity rights. No, that impact will be felt by children like mine who are already fighting an uphill battle. 

I am sure this e-mail has an angry tone and this is not unintentional though I would have hoped that I would have never gotten to the point where I would be angry about this. In my communications with members of the General Assembly who are refusing to make the simple changes to S676 that would preserve mental health parity rights, those members fall back on the line “ASNC supports us so why don’t you.” Therefore, it is your support for this legislation this is actually helping our children to lose their rights.  If you really do care about families like mine, you should be appalled by that fact.

I assume your response to my concerns is that “giving up these rights is the only way legislation will happen.” Quite frankly, that is absolutely untrue. We have been making progress on good legislation over the past couple of years and I believe meaningful change would have occurred even without your agreement to allow our children on the spectrum to lose rights while gaining some others. I ask, “Have you considered why Blue Cross is requiring these rights to be given up?” Do you truly think that it’s just because they think it is necessary to ensure caps are enforceable? I hope not because that certainly is not the case. You need not look further than all the other states that have caps but don’t have an elimination of mental health parity to see that giving up mental health parity rights is not necessary.

Again, it was never my intention to become angry about this process but it has gotten to the point where it is unavoidable as a result of your organization’s willingness to discuss or even attempt to preserve mental health parity rights. It’s not too late for you to change that position. If you don’t you should really reconsider holding yourself out as an organization that helps autism families because in this case you have done much more harm than good.


Brian Pearce